Sugarkind*

Most of us don’t read the ingredients content’s on the food packages, and freshly baked bread most of the time doesn’t have it. So, we don’t know exactly what we eat.

Why am I tackling this topic at all, when it is hardly interesting? Well, I guess I’m some antiquity or something like this. Maybe I’m in the years when the world, the so called progress and human endeavors look awkward.

The thing is, that one day I went to a local store and wondered how come that I see so many obese people around me, while there were practically none in my youth. Okay, we were mostly walking to the school and spent afternoons playing outdoors or helping our parents and relatives, neighbors or friends.

So we were moving a lot and burned the so called calorie intake in no time.

But there is yet another thing that passes us unnoticed.

Here. I’m going to list you some of the daily commands from my childhood:

  • Don’t overeat yourself.
  • Don’t eat sweets for a breakfast.
  • Don’t eat sweets before a regular meal.
  • Don’t eat sweets – it makes holes in your teeth.
  • Don’t eat too much before you go to sleep.
  • Drink water, if you are thirsty, or bitter lukewarm yeast&chicory coffee on a hot summer day, or unsweetened tea.
  • Eat an apple if you a hungry during meals.
  • Chew the food thoroughly.
  • Eat slowly. Don’t throw the food into yourself like into a sack.
  • Looks like these words still resonate in me and compose my diet.

When I look around, it looks like now everything has to be sweet and fast. If we look the packages we bring into our dwellings more closely we might be surprised. I was.

But before that I read a sentence that raised my interest to look this topic more closely. The sentence goes  as follows: »At the beginning of the 20th century – before the widespread cultivation of sugar beets and imports of sugar from cane – intake per capita in Europe was below 5 kg per year rising to the 40-60 kg per year seen in Europe today.« (Health in All Policies, Prospects and Potentials, 2006, http://www.eu2006.fi )

Actually sugar is in many products, we wouldn’t expect it in. Sugar is a preservative, but we used it in preserving sweet food, like jams, jellies, stewed fruit, and cookies. Now, if you read the ingredients content’s you can find it in meat, bread and stewed sour vegetables – in many foods you won’t expect to find sugar.

And guess what, now children eat their cereals in milk for breakfast, and a cup of it contains so much sugar as 6 doughnuts, was told on The Doctor’s TV several years ago (sorry, I can’t find the archived file to state the exact time when the show was aired).

This is one side of this scenario. The other is that people producing sugarcane are mostly so poor they can’t afford themselves much more than to eat one raw sugarcane stalk a day. So on one side we have people getting obese and sick from the excessive intake of a product of a processed plant that is actually a medicinal plant. And on the other side we have starving people who survive by the day consuming that very stalk of that plant.

For the doubters: medicinal properties of sugar cane (http://lifestyle.iloveindia.com/lounge/benefits-of-sugarcane-1882.html), and the same seems true also for the sugar beet http://herbs-treatandtaste.blogspot.com/2012/03/sugar-beet-source-of-sugar-in-cool.html

*In accordance with the saying ‘you are what you eat’; the humankind seems to have turned into sugarkind.

Advertisements

The Impact of Climate Geoengineering on Agriculture

The Climate Geoengineering (CG) is being carried out for nearly two decades now. Some[1] state it has started in 1996. The precise composition of the aerosols used in CG in a particular moment is known only to those who order it. History of the CG dates back to the WW2 with production of fog during bombing and after WW2 it continued as hail prevention, while in English speaking countries it was also carried out as Air Force experiments on the inhabitants (i.e. Project Clover Leaf, etc.) The CG intensified in 1996 as a project of American Air Force to own the weather[2] and as a trial to combat global warming, which was based on climate models – according to some of the experts; some of those climate models have a 100% error. There is no need to spend time discussing[3] global warming, hence even some more visible advocates of global warming like prof. Chris Folland state that the data aren’t important, hence their recommendations are based on models. We should mention, though, that the climate changes were invented in England in 19th century, but the idea wasn’t picked up, at least not until it was used by Margaret Thatcher[4], what caused closing of the coal mines and transition to the nuclear power production of the electric energy. For quite some time, it is being mentioned that the stock of crude oil will expire. King M. Huber[5] who claimed that the stock of crude oil will run out, made this up. Of course this doesn’t mean that the changes regarding the use of the crude oil wouldn’t be welcome. Although my car mechanic says that the transition to the electric car will cause the economy to collapse entirely. It looks like when those on the top of the pyramid want to achieve something, they invent a problem and repeat it long enough for the masses to react on the presented problem and then propose the solutions, like implementing new taxes or technologies. Climate Geoengineering has mainly two major ways of operation: Solar Radiation Management (SRM; SAG- Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering is part of it) and Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR)[6]. How does cloud seeding – chemtrails carried out in troposphere fit in this operation is not exactly explained. During the UNEP Nagoya conference in 2010 a five (5) year moratorium on geoengineering treaty was signed except for the experiments in minor extent[7].

In May 2012 the ETC Group in the framework of the project HOME (Hands off Mother Earth) managed to prevent an English trial to inject sulphur into the atmosphere (project named SPICE in the framework of geoengineering), The ETC group is inviting everyone who is willing to oppose the geoengineering to: www.handsoffmotherearth.org How it is to breathe sulphur we know from times when we were heating on coal. Maybe something can be achieved this way.

Geoengineering is primarily big business and will not solve the problem, because it was established primarily to use the weather in military purposes and striving to own what isn’t their property. Maybe people should demand to declare the sky as a nature resort where any experiments with chemicals, nanoparticles, artificial DNA and ELF waves (radar technology which seems to be mostly used on the Earth poles) are forbidden[8]. Meanwhile, in 1997, the trading with the weather started on Chicago stock exchange CME-GLOBEX. In 2012, 8 metropoles where included in this trade, some of them European. In USA cloud seeding was going on for quite a while by now[9]. That’s why also the consequences are more thorough. Some advocates of prohibition of geoengineering (Rosalind Peterson, Barbara H. Peterson and others) as a consequences of geoengineering mention:

  • Reduced harvest, because the plants can’t ripen due to the lack of sunlight;
  • Acidification of the soil due to the use of aluminum, iron and other particles[10], and various salts;
  • Dying of the trees from top to bottom;
  • Disappearing of the bees.

Other authors[11] mention reappearance of rachitis where it was extinguished (due to vitamin D insufficiency), incidences of new diseases, decrease of the immunity of living beings, disappearance of the bats, changing pH value of the soil. Among other consequences we can also find lowering of the sky for about 1 km due to the less clouds being formed in the higher layers of the atmosphere, changed composition of the atmosphere, changed composition of the clouds, changed outlook of the sky, the increase of CO2 due to the increased air traffic[12] , and presumably increased use of fuel due to the increased air traffic. As it was proved already in 1998 that the blue light the receptors in human eyes receive from the sky during a clear sunny day increases immunity, vigilance, brain activity (e.g. people make less errors) and more appropriate emotional responses, we can presume that an increase of the milkieness of the sky decreases the benefits of the blue light[13]. American authors state that serious consequences of the stratospheric aerosol geoengineering for the living beings appear after 10 years of its execution. Higher concentration of aluminum in the air also increases the incidence of Alzheimer disease. It is not difficult to establish that a poisonous atmosphere won’t contribute to the health of the living beings on Earth. The articles and reports from US mention primarily chemical exhausts; newer are also nano exhausts or nanotrails. For this purpose MEMS or GEMS are used (MEMS – micro electromechanical sensors, GEMS – global electromechanical sensors), that are used to detect the activity inside the clouds and can land on the plate, or in the eyes or noses and are considered a cause of the increase of the allergies. Yet, these are only two among the long list of the consequences of the stratospheric aerosol geoengineering. Condensation trails due to the aircraft gas exhausts are forming on ca. 8000 m altitude and -40 degree Celsius and 70% humidity and disperse after 2-3 minutes, because they are made of ice crystals; with higher humidity they linger longer; in higher altitudes the condensation trails don’t form.

Disclaimer: I stopped following this topic two years ago, so the data are from back then. I didn’t conduct any study; and I merely present the data found in the open sources on the internet.

Correction: A website that states that chemtrails is an exotic weapon and that geoengineering is not the same as chemtrails: http://chemtrailsplanet.net/2013/12/13/correction-chemtrails-are-not-the-same-as-geoengineering-as-srm/

A website that claims to monitor geoengineering: http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/

And a must read article about nano chemtrailshttp://willthomasonline.net/Nano_Chemtrails.html

——————————————————————————–

[1] Furland, Fran: Chemtraili so nad nami (Chemtrails are above us)

[2] See: Weather as a Air Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather by 2025

[3] The experts connected to IPCC state that the temperature on Earth has averagely grown for 0,56 degree Celsius in the last 100 years.

[4] Courtney, Richard:Global warming and how it all began http://www.john-daly.com/history.htm.

[5] Nafte ne bo zmanjkalo http://www.7dni.com/clanek2012051605783704 (Crude oil will not run out)

[6] See: Prof. Shepherd, John,  CBE FRS Geoengineering the climate: an overview and update in Geoengineering case study UK.pdf

[7] Oct. 2010 UNEP/CBD/COP/10/L.36, Art. 8. (w)1

[8] See: CEDAR, DARN, SuperDARN on the use of radar technologies for the study of the upper layers of the atmosphere, and SRGMI organization supporting the research in the field of geoengineering.

[9] See: Case Orange: Contrail Science, it’s impact on climate and weather manipulation programs conducted by united states and its allies

[10] All consequences should not be assigned to the SAG; in USA every rocket launch that carries a space shuttle into the atmosphere, releases 240 tons of HCl, 26 tons of Cl2, 7 tons of NO and 304 tons of Al2O3 . HCl acid melts 16 m concrete launching platform, raises the concentration of HCl acid in the nearby lakes up to 3M, and causes massive dying of the fish in the oceans and destroys the car paint on the cars. The major chemists think, that HCl acid is the major cause of the holes in the ozone layer of the atmosphere. http://r3zn8d.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/shuttle-launch-acid-rain.pdf In previous years NASA tested the rocket fuel ALICE(aluminum and ice from water) http://www.chemgeneration.com/si/milestones/raketna-goriva.html The rocket launching schedule for 2012 and an archive for until 2007 http://www.satelliteonthenet.co.uk/index.php/launch-schedule

[11] Röver D.: Chemtrail Health Effects and Environment

[12] SAG is being carried out also by commercial air carriers, while American Air Force intends to use the pilotless aircrafts for this purpose.

[13] Holzman, C. D.: What’s in a Color? The Unique Human Health Effects of Blue Light

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2831986/ in Philips goLITE BLU Plus HF3332 Product Description

Below: clearly visible normal clouds, we were once used to, and the seeded clouds (look like gauze like tissue).

Clearly visible ordinary and seeded clouds

A Free Gardening Plot for the Poorest Members of the Community

About half a century ago, I lived in a country with the inflation reaching thousand percent and over. Apart from running out of money right in the middle of the month and being unable to get to our jobs except by foot or by bicycle, it was fun. We were all millionaires. Money wasn’t anything serious anymore. The situation resembled the situation in »Gone with the Wind« where money was used for stuffing the holes in the walls. We played children’s roulette with it instead. Then, overnight, our country lost 80% of its market, the 30% allowed profit margin, and only domestic market remained.

During high inflation times our self-sustenance with the food produced in our own country was 80-90%. People owned small farms, where some of the owners farmed after their full time jobs. Other people rented the land from private farmers and some from the state. House owners usually had gardens, where fruits, vegetables and even poultry or other small animals were kept. Yet others rented small gardening plots in the town’s vicinity, where they grew vegetables and fruits. Growing own food wasn’t disgraceful then.

And, we were sharing within the communities – what one had in abundance he/she would offer to the neighbor and receive something useful in return. People regularly went to help their relatives who were farming and received food in return. In afternoons many went to help their friends or relatives to build or repair their houses.

Some 25 years later those gardening plot groups were banished, because their shags were disrupting the views of the town officials. This happened while hypermarkets were built.  So, at present we have about 2,5 square meters shopping space per person (above EU average) and some 10-20% of self-sustenance with the domestic food production, declining expertise in agricultural knowledge among the young generations, an increasing expertise among the poor in chasing discounted food offered by the continuous marketing actions and no limits to the profit margins. Supermarkets offer a separate box with discounted vegetables and fruits nearing their expiration date and a cart to place a purchased item for the poor. A gloomy sight!

Then in 2005, when I visited my relatives in the USA, I observed how people used their credit cards. The situation looked so familiar, I was sure it won’t last long before the whole system crashes. I didn’t need to wait more than three years. The entropic system crumbled like a house of cards and spread all over the planet.

However, it looks like poor people can support themselves during recession when they can grow food on their own or rented gardening plots. The more natural the food production, the better it is as we can read in Food and Permaculture, where David Blume states that “permacultural farming yields 8 times more than what USDA claims possible” and 22% CEC (Cation Exchange Capacity) for the soil (the divide line between dead and alive soil is 5% CEC).

I presume that every municipality owns some (surrounding) land. So, my suggestion is that every municipality on the planet offers a free of charge gardening plot in the town’s vicinity to its poorest members. Maybe they can even offer some flat roofs, if they can hold the weight of the soil and vegetables. It wouldn’t be such entirely new idea, some states and communities have provided themselves with gardening before as we can see in the documentary series Around the World in 80 Gardens by Colin Jones and other similar documentaries.

There should be no rent for the poorest; the only condition should be that they learn how to grow organically produced vegetables and fruits.  And maybe they can dig a well for the watering. There are more benefits to this than just food supply. Usually it is more satisfactory to produce own food than to beg for it at one of the charity institutions. It usually has more dignity in it and people don’t lose their connectedness to the land so quickly. Their children might pick up some agricultural knowledge while helping to garden as well. And in due time they might become not only experts in gardening, but also experts in avoiding food adds for they will learn that the most delicious food comes from the soil and not from the store shelves. In this way the poor might not live in such scarcity and the agricultural knowledge won’t be lost either.